liferay-portal
liferay-portal copied to clipboard
LPD-22886
Forwarded from: https://github.com/liferay-commerce/liferay-portal/pull/4892 (Took 1 ci:forward
attempt in 45 seconds)
Console
@brianikim @liferay-commerce
Original pull request comment: https://github.com/liferay-commerce/liferay-portal/pull/4853/ https://github.com/brianikim/liferay-portal/pull/162
@andrea-ale-sbarra , resent from above
:heavy_check_mark: ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 5 minutes
Click here for more details.
Base Branch:
Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 0499cf89ff56a4ecbf43abc7a8a726ed015459c5
Sender Branch:
Branch Name: LPD-22886
Branch GIT ID: a02cb519881cc1ecc3267d80ec77c631753d35d3
1 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.
:heavy_check_mark: ci:test:stable - 33 out of 33 jobs passed
:heavy_check_mark: ci:test:relevant - 57 out of 58 jobs passed in 1 hour 41 minutes
Click here for more details.
Base Branch:
Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 0499cf89ff56a4ecbf43abc7a8a726ed015459c5
Upstream Comparison:
Branch GIT ID: 9bb99cce5d5e9bdd8c1d9facaa8ee230ba1a0d83
Jenkins Build URL: EE Development Acceptance (master) - 496 - 2024-04-17[12:38:19]
ci:test:stable - 33 out of 33 jobs PASSED
33 Successful Jobs:
ci:test:relevant - 56 out of 58 jobs PASSED
2 Failed Jobs:
test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest(master)- build-iw-jdk8
- central-requirements-jdk8
- empty-osgi-core-dir-mysql57-jdk8
- functional-smoke-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8_stable
- functional-upgrade-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8_stable
- functional-upgrade-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8_stable/0/0
- functional-upgrade-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8_stable/0/1
- functional-upgrade-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8_stable/0/2
- functional-upgrade-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8_stable/0/3
- functional-upgrade-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8_stable/0/4
- functional-upgrade-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8_stable/0/5
- js-unit-jdk8
- modules-compile-jdk8
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/0
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/1
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/2
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/3
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/4
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/5
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/6
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/7
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/8
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/9
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/10
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/11
- modules-compile-jdk8/0/12
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/0
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/1
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/2
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/3
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/4
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/5
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/6
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/7
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/8
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/9
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/10
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/11
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/12
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/13
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0/14
- modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8_stable
- modules-semantic-versioning-jdk8
- modules-unit-jdk8
- modules-unit-jdk8_stable
- modules-unit-project-templates-jdk8
- patching-tool-mysql57-jdk8
- playwright-compile-jdk8
- playwright-js-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8
- playwright-js-tomcat90-mysql57-jdk8_stable
- pmd-jdk8
- rest-builder-jdk8
- semantic-versioning-jdk8
- service-builder-jdk8
- unit-jdk8
- unit-jdk8_stable
- workspaces-compile-jdk8
56 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.
This pull contains no unique failures.
Failures in common with acceptance upstream results at 9bb99cce5d5e9bdd8c1d9facaa8ee230ba1a0d83:
To conserve resources, the PR Tester does not automatically run for forwarded pull requests.
@brianikim the CMD values don't seem to match the JSP file names they map to. Can you resend? Thx.
ci:reopen
@brianchandotcom , this was done intentionally.
I would say our naming scheme is fairly unique in circumstance.
~~I do not see many CMD values being matched to the JSP file names they map to.~~ I do see examples of this.
For the naming scheme here, it was explicitly done to "match" to the actionURL
used. For example:
<aui:form action="<%= editProductDefinitionProductGroupsActionURL %>" method="post" name="fm">
<aui:input name="<%= Constants.CMD %>" type="hidden" value="updateProductGroups" />
<portlet:actionURL name="/cp_definitions/edit_cp_definition" var="editProductDefinitionAttachmentsActionURL" />
<aui:form action="<%= editProductDefinitionAttachmentsActionURL %>" cssClass="pt-4" method="post" name="fm">
<aui:input name="<%= Constants.CMD %>" type="hidden" value="updateAttachments" />
I intentionally stripped out editProductDefinition
and repurposed the value to "update" + "x"
Using above example,
Would following be more acceptable @brianchandotcom ?
updateAttachments
-> updateAttachmentFileEntries
updateProductGroups
-> updatePricingClasses
https://github.com/brianchandotcom/liferay-portal/pull/149700