Bartosz Gołaszewski

> @brgl let me know if you'd prefer to stick with relative vs absolute imports and we can address them in this series. Within the gpiod module, I'd prefer to...

Have you tried using [b4](https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/)? It's really a game changer for mailing-list oriented development. It allows to track revisions, changes etc. I recommend using it for interacting with the lkml.

> @brgl i noticed that `bindings/python/gpiod/internal.py` is still marked as under the GPL license and not LGPL, should this be fixed? Ah good catch. And seems like bindings/python/tests/ should all...

> Here's a branch https://github.com/vfazio/libgpiod/tree/vfazio-mypy > > Can you let me know if there need to be more splits or combines? No, it looks good to me. I really don't...

> @brgl I'm mostly happy with where i have the branch at this point. I'll push new refs in a second. > > I have not run unit tests on...

> Hmm i see we have unit tests that are unfortunately actually assuming the repr can be eval'd. > > I don't really agree with this choice and we can...

I think my goal was to silently ignore names that exist but were not configured but raise an error for names that don't exist. Right now it seems we error...

The "pre-existing" issues needs clarifying: I'm not seeing any and the tests pass fine for me on master with linux v6.11. What kernel are you on? Anything else in the...

Ah, isn't this the issue introduced in the kernel by commit `b44039638741 ("gpiolib: cdev: Ignore reconfiguration without direction")`? You need a recent kernel and current master of libgpiod I think.

> So, some nice to haves: > > * the bindings have a shim to make things work across various kernel versions Oh God, no. I don't want the ifdiffery...