bretg

> can you confirm it is not advised anymore The intention of this issue is to have a community discussion. Some of us believe the current ID structure is sub-optimal,...

Updated description to reflect the conversations we've had in meetings.

I've taken a cut at outlining a Prebid path for GPP support. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dRxFUFmhh2jGanzGZvfkK_6jtHPpHXWD7Qsi6KEugeE/edit?usp=sharing Would suggest reviewing in this week's meeting.

@jsnellbaker - no one has done that level of thinking on this yet. You're way out ahead, so suggestions welcome.

There may be some concern about automatically sending all events to all analytics adapters. This needs to be discussed in the PBJS committee.

There's some overlap here with a new issue I opened -- https://github.com/prebid/prebid-server/issues/2367 For other reasons, I proposed a generic new PBS response extension: `ext.seatnonbid`. If a bidder doesn't bid but...

I like @laurb9 's first proposal because it would be easy for Prebid Server to collect auctionconfigs from multiple bid adapters without having to merge. I also like getting away...

So I think this is what you're arguing for @dgirardi ? ``` { ext: { fledge: { auctionconfigs: [{ impid: "123", bidder: "bidderA", config: { ... } },{ impid: "123",...

I'm ok with this. @laurb9 ? Has this been discussed in IAB circles?

> The bidder is the alias, correct ? I used the term "bidder" instead of "seat". It's the entity that's returning the config. Most often that will be the biddercode...