bretg

We discussed in PBS committee last week and agreed to take another crack at this feature integrated as part of the existing `bidadjustmentfactors` feature. The additional requirements are: - support...

@bsardo - we settled on 305 in the PMC last week. Removed references to the others

Discussed in last week's PBS meeting. Additional requirements were added that requires some re-thinking: - adjustments may differ per deal ID - adjustments can be static, i.e. not relative to...

released with PBS-Java 3.2

@patmmccann - it would be nice to simplify the feature and say that if `bidadjustments` are specified, then `bidadjustmentfactors` is ignored. But open to the behavior here -- which would...

I've been asked to defend the perceived complexity of the "schema/value" approach. The alternate approach would be to support a full set of permutations in strict JSON. We would have...

I propose that if bidadjustments is specified, then bidadjustmentfactors is ignored. Will give this one more run by the committee in the next meeting.

@bjorn-lw - @PubMatic-OpenWrap has stepped up to start the porting of the floors feature to PBS-Go in https://github.com/prebid/prebid-server/pull/2341 Not sure if that PR covers updating the floors for bid adjustments,...

@patmmccann - we discussed in backlog grooming today and agreed: - if the dimensions that could affect bid adjustments are limited to mediatype, bidder, and deal, then we'll go with...

Based on issues found in PBJS, we're going to want test cases here covering the adjustment to floors. @patmmccann also has a use case that wouldn't be covered by how...