Brian

@katblanchette @brian-knosp, It seems that there is a pull request that already includes this correction, this would be PR #661. It would be better to address it there and close...

Thanks @katblanchette. One minor thing, I noticed that the original phrasing is actually "What if my work is wrong?" and the rest of the section also speaks generally about work...

Thank you Brian makes sense to me. Reference: https://github.com/nasa/Transform-to-Open-Science/tree/main/docs/Area2_Capacity_Sharing/Open-Science-101/modules/Module_5/Lesson_3#capturing-the-research-process-accurately-in-the-making-of-results

Thank you @katblanchette. I can confirm that this is also a duplicate #683 which addresses the text mentioned here. I will close this specific issue likewise. @brian-knosp thank you for...

@katblanchette @danielskatz I'll break down the different items here and apply my knowledge to what I think would be a good solution, but happy to discuss with the larger group....

Thanks @Catch2T8 for the contribution. And thank you @nasacrawford for the revised definition, this definitely makes more sense as a definition for this coming from the software world myself. I...

Thank you @katblanchette I have addressed the issue in M2L1. For your reference (and for the MOOC developers) you may look at PR #801 to see the exact change. The...

Thank you for submitting this suggestion about the Open Data module @likeajumprope . We are actively working on a review process for OS101 and we should be reviewing these in...

Thank you @katblanchette, I have addressed the issue in M4L1. One thing to note is there are example bullets of specific software under these. I.e., FPrime, PODAAC, etc. I assumed...

Thank you for submitting this suggestion @ritajett. We are actively working on a review process for OS101 and we should be reviewing these in the coming weeks. Stay tuned and...