Christian Brauner
Christian Brauner
> The PR in its current form contradicts your statement. Last I checked I am neither the author of this commit nor am I in control of the actual author's...
Hey @ktprograms creating idmapped mounts requires filesystem support and 9p simply hasn't been converted to support idmapped mounts yet.
In principle 9pfs can support this going forward.
Yeah, I can certainly help you there. Is it ok if I wait until after next week. I won't have time before that.
> I was not aware of a patch for this though, interesting . > > @brauner: Some questions about this: > > 1. Just for clarity: This problem only occurs...
> @brauner: Thank you for the information. > > > > 1. I assume it is not possible or "easy" to put the patch(es) into a kernel module? > >...
> This is [supposed](https://dummdida.tumblr.com/post/121087781445/re-udev-events-in-a-container) [to work](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49687378/how-to-get-hosts-udev-events-from-a-docker-container) with running the container in the host's network namespace (currently --network=host) and bind-mounting the host's dev. Issue https://github.com/containers/toolbox/issues/468 also sounds like this actually did...
> Interesting. > > Does this mean that Toolbx/Podman should set up some sort of bridge to forward the uevents? @brauner , you mentioned [cutting off](https://mastodon.social/@brauner/109534994321070125) the seqnum field of...
Even if you inject it is my point.
> FTR, I was playing around with that a few weeks ago, and so far I couldn't make it work -- writing back the received uevents without SEQNUM into the...