Bramus

Hmm, if one the positions (`start` / `end`) would be optional, I’d rather make the `end` one optional. Like so: ```css @keyframes composed { 0% fadeInDown; 45% flip; 55% fadeOutDown;...

> I think this should be covered by [group effects](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-2/#grouping-and-synchronization) which are proposed for Web Animations level 2, however the corresponding CSS syntax has yet to be proposed. Oh nice,...

Flipping things around: What if we had a top-layer pseudo element, i.e. `::top-layer`? It would be a pseudo-element that’s only available on the `html` element. You wouldn’t use it (or...

It’s not explicitly forbidden in the spec [just yet](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7463), but if `:has()` were to accept the `::backdrop` pseudo, `:open` would make sense - `:open` = open elements - `:open:has(::backdrop)` =...

🤦‍♂️ Ah yeah, should’ve checked the spec – https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/#::backdrop-pseudo-element

The forms I was talking about in the meeting are named “natural language forms”.  It might have been a fashion thing because most articles I find date from 2013-2015....

_As copied over from https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6674#issuecomment-930542414 (per request by @fantasai):_ Note that these "element slides into view"-animations can also be about a portion of that element, e.g. "only start when a...

> ``` > view-timeline-range: [start|end]? [start|end]? ? > ``` I like this, as it gives me – as an author – the freedom to use any combination without needing to...

> Longer term we could even accept these as keyframe offsets similar to how `from` and `to` map to 0% and 100% we could map ` ` to the appropriate...

@flackr https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2022Jun/0013.html