bramtayl

I wonder if it might be nicer to have a utility function to do it for users? I had a sed script written up; we could potentially build a binary...

Out of curiousity, what would be the problem with just using a newer version of glibc?

@staticfloat I ran ``` grep --recursive --files-with-matches '#include ' . | xargs sed -i 's/#include /#include /' grep --recursive --files-with-matches '# include ' . | xargs sed -i 's/# include...

I've making some progress, but it looks like there's not a neat correspondence between the new headers and the old headers. I don't see `sys/file.h` or `stdlib.h`. I'm ready to...

I've updated https://github.com/JuliaPackaging/Yggdrasil/pull/1367 with my progress so far

I'm running into similar issues building systemd, and using an older version doesn't seem like it will work this time. It seems like their must be an easy solution. Maybe...

> Users with an old glibc wouldn't be able to use our binaries @giordano can you give more detail here? It seems to me that glibc is mostly backwards compatible,...

Oh I see, never mind about the backwards compatibility thing. According to the [README](https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/README) systemd requires glibc >= 2.16 so I think 2.17 should do it (still can't guarantee I'll...

I think I can wait until the end of November too, there's no real urgency

@staticfloat guess what month it is?!!!