bpmn-miwg-tools
bpmn-miwg-tools copied to clipboard
bpmn-miwg
Tools for validating and comparing test results collected by the BPMN Model Interchange Working Group at the OMG.
http://bpmn-miwg.github.io/bpmn-miwg-tools/ In the result table, Software AG has 10/10, Trisotech has 12/12... we are not certain why Software AG are missing two results. Also, C.5 and C.6 seems to not...
There is an unintended implication at the start of a year that participation is less than up to date by displaying Amber icons in these columns. Decision taken 05 Jan...
C.2.1 may potentially benefit from previous work on C.2.0
Of course it is possible this is correct but more likely something has gone wrong as numbers have previously been very high due to false negatives.
Consider this line from reference model A.1.0 ``` ``` transformed to this by bpmn.io 0.5.0: ``` ``` Three attributes have been removed: 1. completionQuantity="1" This is the default (see page...
In the comparison found at http://tools.bpmn-miwg.cloudbees.net/xml-compare/itp-commerce%20Process%20Modeler%206.3488.15730-A-export.html the tool wrongfully reports a missing process element: Difference found in presence of child node (id:22) Reference:/definitions[1]/process[1] : semantic:process Vendor:null : null
We discussed this finding from the xml-compare tool, which highlights a very small rounding difference between the reference model and the vendor model. We agreed to modify the reference model...
Consider this excerpt from the A.1.0 reference model ``` ``` The Yaoqiang 2 model writes the same thing as: ``` ``` The xml-compare tool reports: - Difference found in attribute...
Consider this excerpt from the A.1.0 reference model ``` ``` The Yaoqiang 2 model writes the same thing as: ``` ``` The xml-compare tool reports: - Difference found in attribute...