Basile

Jumping in that old convo: I noticed that the fast-track would fail if you process a single anat in a multi-session dataset (and results is output in a session folder)...

I would say calling `self.is_special_annex_remote` in the fsck function? That should raise an error before trying to fsck. WDYT?

Not sure about the right approach to fixing that issue: - resolving source to absolute path for the root dataset and then submodules candidate will be absolute too, simpler option...

Maybe it needs to also be implemented for `get` when subsequently getting subdatasets. WDYT?

Not sure what is wrong in the config, I am pretty sure that I simply forked the repo, what access should I grant and to who and where?

> on the right under Paricipants - do you see smth like > > ? didn't look where generally that is configured in profile not it isnt' there. 

https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/5634 because the fork is in an org not an individual...

The error is still present for `*UNIT1.json` files, was there any reason it was not integrated in this PR? This causes pybids.BIDSLayout.build_path to fail. :-/

Hi, thanks for that very useful container. Do you know if that is possible to run apptainer without-suid in an unpriviledged docker. Our use case would be to run apptainer...

I managed to make it work following https://osg-htc.org/docs/worker-node/install-apptainer/#configuring-docker-to-work-with-apptainer but it required an extra `--security-opt apparmor=unconfined` Modified the Dockerfile to add a few package for squash/fuse ``` FROM golang:1.20.1-alpine3.17 as builder...