Anders Hovmöller

Ouch. Yea that's a great example. I would like to say I escape this by being smart but I believe I escape this because we've removed incorrect mutations of *...

This seems like mostly the same as what we discussed in https://github.com/boxed/mutmut/issues/28 but for different reasons obviously. Maybe one should be able to just plug in an arbitrary python function...

Actually, thinking more about this it would be interesting if you could explain more about your situation. In my experience mutating constants is one of the more useful things for...

Ah, I see. Well yea, in that case the current system to deal with it is `# pragma: no mutate`. What do you think about more advanced exclusions like having...

Yea, maybe a global and built in whitelist would be a good idea. I have another candidate for that: ```python __import__('pkg_resources').declare_namespace(__name__) ``` we always have to put a pragma no...

@nklapste I've released a new version of mutmut that ignored a bunch of these by default. It's also got an overhauled cache system that is way better. Give it a...

For the case @lundybernard has, the line obviously won't do because the mutated string is on a different line than `log.debug`, so maybe we should just pass the entire multiline...

Hitting any percentage above zero is also an endless game of whack a mole to be fair :) It's just harder to reach 100% the first time, that's the big...

https://github.com/boxed/mutmut/issues/138 is the same thing as this issue really.

I had an idea.. what if the answer is "all of the above"? Matching a full line with "contains" is option number 1, then regexes as option number 2, then...