bosd
bosd
btw, I run this trough the profiler. No noticable difference on the performance.
Just reverted the performance changes. As we are discussing them in #470. This one is now independent from that one. When tests are green, we can merge this one.
Is this what you are looking for? Or get some inspiration from? Did'nt test this. https://github.com/OCA/edi/pull/399/files#diff-652ac3ae132c668bf2ac61903174bbc0c254c98bf549aac7cad47a515259ed32R70-R128
> I think that this should be optional. A copier question. Indeed, That would be nice!
Can someone re-trigger the tests?
I've got it running on fedora 38 with python 3.11 **Method 1:** Use another chrome package than the one shipped with pyppeteer. (Which is rather old) To use the one...
Didn't know cookie cutter. Looks impressive. Can you move forward with that?
@dimitern & @vinayak-mehta Could you please edit the repo settings so PR's can be opened. :pray: @vinayak-mehta Could you please add more maintainers to Pypi. You can add me, @foarsitter...
> ever get resolved - is there a similar style replacement package that people can use? Sadly no, But we moved on and merged it into py-pdf organization. The new...
Hey! As https://github.com/camelot-dev/camelot/issues/343, we try to build a maintained fork at [pypdf_table_extraction](https://github.com/py-pdf/pypdf_table_extraction). The first release can be found https://pypi.org/project/pypdf-table-extraction/ Can you check if the issue still exsists?