Alexandre Borela

There are just a few places that references it https://github.com/borela/naomi/search?q=flow1%2Fprolog&unscoped_q=flow1%2Fprolog&type=Code

No need in this case, i believe you want to apply different scopes to different parts of the pragma, in that case, you can use capturing groups: ``` - match:...

As for backreferences not working, it was because sublime use ruby's regex engine and it does not support `*` or `+` inside backrefs, you can test the patterns here: http://rubular.com/

Yeah, the current method I am using would not highlight @flow in: ``` /* some comment @flow */ ``` I don't know if flow take this into consideration, if it...

Currently, the syntax is making a distinction between the declaration of a generic: ``` function abc(){} // and its usage: abc() ```  It's possible to highlight those cases by...

> I understood why you draw attention to this distinction, but thinking further — in fact they are types. It's a type variable, so it is a type. It's like...

I sent some patchs to the master branch which should solve most issues:  Please check if it's working.

Thank you for confirming it :D I am leaving this open because we still have the issue of @flow not being highlighted in block comments other than `// @flow` or...

It is indeed a compatibility issue, I'll remove the `meta.naomi` scope tomorrow.

I removed the meta scope https://github.com/borela/naomi/releases/tag/v4.2.3 and the snippets are working now :D