sites that failed to parse correctly
Leaving this open as we hope to keep adding sites that fail to parse and bug fixes that correct it.
~~http://shrinik.blogspot.com/2012/05/brief-introduction-of-test-automation.html~~
~~http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2012/05/07/automating-boring-testing-activities-with-tox/~~
the
conversion seems to mess up the rendering hard core.
~~http://www.osnews.com/story/25916/The_Android_Sooner_the_ill-fated_prototype_killed_by_the_iPhone~~
Shouldn't get the extra conent at the bottom with comments/etc.
~~http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1126~~
Shouldn't get the comment form at the bottom, debatable if the comments themselves should come along for the ride.
~~http://rogerstringer.com/2012/04/16/using-dropbox-as-a-git-repository~~
end up with no content
~~http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2012/05/bubble-20.html~~
~~pulls a comment as the post content~~
~~Now just pulls in the whole page including all comments.~~
~~http://scripting.com/stories/2012/06/15/theTechPressIsOutToLunch.html~~
No content.
- Fixed in 0.1.4
~~http://newartisans.com/2011/04/letter-to-the-fsf/~~
No content
- Working in 0.1.10
http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/2012/06/30/HasTheNotionOfFilesOutlivedItsUsefulness.aspx - no content
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-airport-ice-bomb-20131013,0,1098000.story
The L.A. Times article appears to be parsing: http://r.bmark.us/u/2cabf797b26f4a
Thanks for checking +craigmaloney, but if you look there's 4 paragraphs of text in the article and only one makes it into the readable parsed version. I guess I should update that to be more clear that it parses, but does it poorly.