boogerlad

don't mean to rush you and I know estimates are hard. Do you think it'll be sometime this year?

:+1:

> Showing all the elements can be a bit huge, perhaps we need to allow internal scroll inside such table views? Yes. I think this is a fantastic idea. The...

dug around the source code a bit. The way to fix this issue is `deleteconstraint unique_name_x` before `undefine x`. Perhaps docs need to be updated or some sort of cascading...

What does "Just" mean in this scenario? Does it mean the constraint is only used by the relation "x"?

> Project:M36 does not support per-table, user-specific granular permissions, so multiple users will all see the same relation variables and other state Should it? A lot of companies don't use...

Is this issue about implementing deferred constraints or multiple assignment operator?

Thanks! I did read page 126 but wasn't sure which direction Project:M36 would take. This would also allow for true 1:1 relationships between tables instead of 1:[0,1] at best without...

Is storing 64 bytes of arbitrary data still possible with Triptych? If so, couldn't this be used to replace `tx_extra`?

Is this a "bug" or a "feature"? That is, will the ability to store arbitrary data eventually be removed? I can think of some pretty nifty use cases.