Sandro Bollhalder
Sandro Bollhalder
Shall I create a new one for the counters, so we don't mix them up in here? > There are Event counters in NS2.0 targets, but it's a lot less...
> The "fast reply consumer" is a message from the Direct Reply-to mechanism. It's not a real consumer and it does not use a real queue. It relies on a...
This is now fixed on 6.x branch and on main. Would it be possible to do a bugfix release for the 6.x and close this issue then?
Would it be possible to give a rough timeframe? (We're planning a release of our product, which we hit this issue)
I've done more investigation into this. Since most of the event registration stays for the lifetime of the object and is invoked once or multiple times, I've investigated caching the...
Mind taking a look at this? @stebet @bording @michaelklishin (You were commenting on #970 )
I can't yet request formal reviews, but I would like to start having a discussion about these changes as they should mark the direction of 8.0. @michaelklishin @stebet @danielmarbach @lukebakken
> Sorry wasn't able to finish the whole thing. I have limited time at my hands before christmas. Here are a few thoughts Well it's a big change and any...
> I think my bad that I was delete `bool DispatchConsumersAsync` at all. Maybe it should be marked as obsolete and test `RabbitMQ.Client.Unit.APIApproval.Approve` can pass then. That can be solved...
This is very likely related to #1061. (Creating bindings on a channel that gets disposed and later a reconnect is happening