Bodi Yang

@MattHJensen The first record is calculated based on form 8895-A. This attached excel document include the steps of calculation: [Form8995Calculations_with_Calcfunctions.xlsx](https://github.com/PSLmodels/Tax-Calculator/files/7028459/Form8995Calculations_with_Calcfunctions.xlsx)

@MattHJensen Yes, exactly. This diagram shows the interpretation of this taxpayer's record: not an SSTB, income above phase in, zero W2 wages & property.

@feenberg This excel document is the input variables for taxsim32 of this taxpayer's record, whose taxable income before the QBID is $490,860.66 [record.xlsx](https://github.com/PSLmodels/Tax-Calculator/files/7047159/record.xlsx)

@jdebacker all tests have been passed locally, including the PUF tests. However, the online built in tests failed now (before this commit, the tests were passing online).

@jdebacker yes I have pushed all changes https://github.com/PSLmodels/Tax-Calculator/pull/2662/commits/56708fb9637262e6d9042750e6f4319420fe686f

> @bodiyang Thanks for confirming. I created a new PUF from the most recent `taxdata` and then ran the unit test. All test, except for those using `bokeh` passed, confirming...

> @bodiyang Can you change `environment.yml` to replace `- "bokeh>=1.4.0,

To create an offset function (probably in calculator.py; the logic is to change the wage variable 'e00200' in input variable when there is reform including the employer side payroll tax...

For `c04470` itemized deduction after phase out, I have conducted manual calculations upon number of records showing differences. I am following[Form 1040 SchA](chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/f1040sa--2021.pdf). My manual calculation matches with the Tax-Calculator....

For `c07180`, differences are mostly eliminated in [this PR to change the mapping variables for CDCC](https://github.com/PSLmodels/Tax-Calculator/pull/2710) Only the year 2021 is showing some differences. The reason of this is that...