Bryan Oakley

The first step is to implement a URL for switching from one project to another. Perhaps POST to `/api/set_root` or `/api/set_project`, or perhaps `/admin/set_root` (?) with the body being the...

I haven't decided exactly how to handle this. Yes, eventually I want to be able to edit test cases. I want to keep the /keyword api, and probably add /testcase...

Hmmmmm. That might be nice now, but without some sort of rule naming standards, that could be hit or miss. What if someone writes a rule like named "SpellchecDoc"? I...

I like the idea of the summary. The tag idea might be good, but I'm wanting to keep rules as simple as possible. It will be pretty easy to forget...

I haven't done much testing with rf 2.9 yet, but I don't anticipate many problems. The hub has its own parser so I'm not too worried about incompatibility, though I...

I can't make any promises. Soon, I hope. I've been waiting for keyword tags for years, I'm excited robot finally supports them. On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:39 PM,...

Thanks for the info. Instead of doing file-> new, if you do "python -m rwb.editor newfile.txt", are you able to save? --bryan On Jul 16, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Jussi...

Unfortunately, this behavior is in the robot framework itself. rfhub uses the robot tools to render the documentation. I really don't like the behavior of robot in this respect, but...

It's all doable. You have to be careful though -- changes that make your documentation look good may totally break the documentation of built-in keywords. That's the problem -- it's...

I don't like having the detail in-line with all of the other output. I've always felt the output is too verbose, this just makes it worse. Would it make sense...