Better incoming folder fallback selection

[drws]

blueman: v2.3.5 BlueZ: 5.73 Distribution: Arch Desktop environment: Xfce

• [x] I have consulted the Troubleshooting page and done my best effort to follow.

If the configured incoming transfer folder is not available, Blueman falls back to home folder, notifying user:

Configured directory for incoming files does not exist Please make sure that directory /home/user/Incoming exists or configure it with blueman-services. Until then the default /home/user will be used

$HOME is not the best first fallback choice. Much more appropriate would be $XDG_DOWNLOAD_DIR or $XDG_PUBLICSHARE_DIR. Only if the system doesn't have XDG configured then Blueman could fallback to the home folder.

[infirit]

I disagree

[drws]

Ok. Is there any other option sensible to you than the root of the home directory structure?

[cschramm]

$XDG_PUBLICSHARE_DIR definitely does not seem like a good idea. Also, as far as I know those variables are not specified in any way. They just come from the xdg-user-dirs tools. The only suitable variable from the XDG Base Directory Specification would be $XDG_DATA_HOME. It defaults to $HOME/.local/share, meaning that it's "hidden", thus doesn't seem appropriate for incoming files either.

$XDG_DOWNLOAD_DIR might be reasonable, if set. :shrug: @infirit, what are your points against it?

[infirit]

Zero reason was given why $HOME is not the best fallback. How is using the XDG_DOWNLOAD_DIR any better or worse?

[drws]

So as not to litter the root of an important directory structure where user expects full control of their non-hidden files. Poorly-ported commercial software does that, FOSS mostly tries to avoid it. And even then files are usually put in a custom subfolder. So tidiness and software hygiene is one.

Also a very great majority of userspace applications categorize their files by default in subfolders so users actually expect files in an appropriate standard subfolder. $XDG_DOWNLOAD_DIR seems like the best choice.

Furthermore, security. To try to limit any potential attacks. There are some important config files and scripts in root of home. It doesn't seem the best folder to push 3rd party data files to. Also a bug could cause data flood or corruption. In all these cases there's simply less damage and damage control is easier if files are categorized/contained at least in one of the general data subfolders.

Even further, convenience. A sensible falback=default selection means there's one less path to worry about when setting up a system.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.