Benoît Legat

The release of JuMP v1.0 is quite imminent and will require MOI v1

JuMP v1.0

1

Could this package be updated to JuMP v1.0? It's already working with JuMP v0.23 so it might be quite easy

```julia julia> x = [1, 2]; n = 1; I = 1:1; julia> x[n^2 .+ I] 1-element Vector{Int64}: 2 julia> JuliaFormatter.format_text("x[n^2 .+ I]") ERROR: Error while PARSING formatted text: 1...

Fix bridge choice for non-Float64

4

Needs https://github.com/jump-dev/PolyJuMP.jl/pull/126

Closes https://github.com/jump-dev/SumOfSquares.jl/issues/344

Non-polynomial example

1

With the rewrite on StarAlgebras in https://github.com/jump-dev/SumOfSquares.jl/pull/355, we can now use bases that are not monomial @kalmarek do you have a nice example we could use in the docs ?

If we use `SA.AlgebraElement` with sparse coefficients, it's not going to exploit the mutability of the underlying MOI expression so it will be inefficient. The advantage of https://github.com/jump-dev/SumOfSquares.jl/pull/355 where we...

Consider the constraint `@constraint(model, x^2 in SOSCone(), basis = Chebyshev)`. If we convert `x^2` to Chebyshev, we get `1/2 * x^2 + 1/2` so the newton polytope gives `[1, x]`....

See https://discourse.julialang.org/t/performance-of-primal-versus-dual-forms-in-jump/116633