BL Choy

> Adding an directive near the top of common.xsd file resolves the errors. > If implemented, this makes the include directives of "measure.xsd" and "common.xsd" in iwxxm.xsd unnecessary as individual...

Thanks Mark. On the other hand, I don't see why we cannot merged the 5 features in measure.xsd into common.xsd: and permanently delete measure.xsd to simplify the schemas. Any views?

Done.

Thanks Mark. This has been implemented in IWXXM 2025-2RC2. But instead of replacing the original spacewx-A7-3.xml, I suggest to include both examples to let people know there could be multiple...

I stole the following picture from a Working Paper of ICAO WG-MOG/19 in 2023 which mentioned an initiative called "Space Weather Advisory Map Service for Aviation". Don't know its current...

Just want to also show possible evolvement of the Space Weather Advisory. The following is extracted from a working paper discussed at ICAO WG-MOG/28 in 2024. Please note that what...

Jan mentioned [BoM's flyer on their space weather services](http://www.bom.gov.au/aviation/data/education/[space-weather-advisories.pdf](http://www.bom.gov.au/aviation/data/education/space-weather-advisories.pdf)).

Implemented in 2025-2RC2.

@ltomovic-ibl: If you check our previous implementation since 2021-2 (see https://schemas.wmo.int/iwxxm/2021-2/examples/) each indicator has its own polygon and there is no ambiguity on their relationships. We now learn that the...

> What I suggested was ... to specify which location indicators were used to compute each polygon. Is that important? The producer of the message tells you the target polygon...