Jyothish Kumar M S

@iFoundSilentHouse Why does it not suit the BSD license of Void? Packages distributed by void don't have to be BSD or MIT. In this case, it is clearly dual licensed....

Btw this doesn't work on musl, does it?

@iFoundSilentHouse But wouldn't that violate every GPL program? What needs to be done in this case is to ensure that a non-free fork of Void should not distribute GPL software...

@iFoundSilentHouse From https://juce.com/get-juce/: > Do I need a JUCE licence if I am not releasing products containing JUCE? > > JUCE is dual licensed under both the JUCE licence and...

Whatever is with the EULA is probably a wording mistake. The FAQ clarifies their intentions well as dual licensing. Perhaps, simply opening a PR with them would be enough to...

I mean issue, not PR. It seems it has to be done at the forum, so I'll do that.

@iFoundSilentHouse The issue templates say that you have to open non bug reports at the forum. I've opened it here: https://forum.juce.com/t/clarify-juce-dual-licensing-properly/60659

> Hey. About bsd it was just my guess. Edit text if there's an available option please @iFoundSilentHouse I'm also not sure what the problem is. JUCE says if you...

> If I understand you correctly, void prefers not to package helio-sequencer(GPLv3) because it has non-free dependency of JUCE which, like any other dependencies, should be downloaded, therefore packaged. Is...

@iFoundSilentHouse I found the problem. They (JUCE) say that you must distribute "your applications under GPL", not "our application" or "your applications bundled with JUCE". So they worry that they...