Bryan A. Jones
Bryan A. Jones
Note that this test failure is from codelens, not from fitb.
I'm confused -- is the proposal to use the `div_id` as the identifier for the question? If so, I am **strongly** opposed. IMHO, this is an internal name, used only...
Good point. I think, long term, we need something other than the `div_id`, since it's not descriptive enough. If I'm correct, anything that can be graded has a problem number...
Sounds good.
I agree on strange labels. I also find them confusing. When they're not set, the numbering makes a lot of sense to me. Here's a screenshot of my book: ...
What assignable things don't have problem numbers?
Hmmm, I'm surprised. To me, a problem is uniquely identified by its page and number on that page, much like a traditional textbook typically presents problems identified by chapter and...
That's my guess -- at one point, the numbering was broken/inconsistent, so the books had to use something else. Now, with working numbering, we should use that.
How do authors provide an explicit display name for a problem? Is this only for certain question types, or does it apply to everything? I agree with Brad that identifying...
I'm in favor of simple assert statements. For beginners, I think that's a reasonable compromise vs. learning to use a test framework.