[trivial]: Correct spellings across bips

[Varunram]

[practicalswift]

ACK 333a605d21c77002efb27aaf2fe352775f1bb3b0

[luke-jr]

BIP 35: @jgarzik BIP 60: @genjix ~~BIPs 11, 16, 61: @gavinandresen~~ BIPs 80 & 81: @justusranvier @jimmysong ~~BIPs 98, 116, 117: @maaku @kallewoof @btcdrak~~ ~~BIP 143: @jl2012 @sipa~~ BIP 152: @TheBlueMatt ~~BIP 157: @Roasbeef @aakselrod @jimpo~~ BIP 158: @Roasbeef @aakselrod BIP 174: @achow101 BIP 176: @jimmysong

@practicalswift Why did you ACK this? You don't seem to be an author for any of the BIPs? O.o

[practicalswift]

@luke-jr I wasn't aware that only BIP authors were supposed to review typo fixes. Sorry about that! :-)

[luke-jr]

Yes, it's kind of a nuisance. I opened #596 a while back, but got push-back on the mailing list. :(

[jimpo]

ACK BIP 157

[sipa]

ACK BIP 143

[kallewoof]

ACK BIP 98, 116, 117.

[gavinandresen]

Perpetual ACK for all trivial changes that do not change the meaning of BIPs I wrote.

[Varunram]

ping @luke-jr, can I edit the PR just to include the BIPs which have been ACKed?

[luke-jr]

Please don't. That would reset the ACKs. I'll manually merge the applicable ones when I get a chance.

[luke-jr]

Merged BIPs 11, 16, 61, 98, 116, 117, 143, 157 in c3e8379b611a53114544b0ed7af5307b022b8ac8

Leaving open for the remaining BIPs (please don't rebase)

[jgarzik]

ACK, for my small part

[murchandamus]

I made a mistake in resolving the merge conflict with BIP-0176 and had to revert the change in another commit to avoid force pushing. I squashed the remaining for typos into master.