roles
roles copied to clipboard
bisq-network
Pricenode Operator
Docs: https://bisq.wiki/Pricenode_Operator Team: @bisq-network/pricenode-operators
@ManfredKarrer, I've assigned you to this role, as I believe you're the only contributor running pricenode(s) at the moment.
I've assigned @Emzy and @mrosseel here, as both are also running pricenodes, per https://github.com/bisq-network/exchange/blob/f73395f6f1e578909f81d4f3b5be80211ae3e01a/core/src/main/java/io/bisq/core/provider/ProvidersRepository.java#L37-L41
I've just assigned myself to this role, as I have now taken over one of @ManfredKarrer's pricenodes. See the commit / PR above for details.
2018.02 report
This is my first report, now that (per the comment above), I've now taken over one of Manfred's pricenode onion addresses.
This pricenode is now backed by code at the HEAD of my cbeams/bisq-pricenode:refactor branch, which will be merged asap (see https://github.com/bisq-network/pricenode/pull/7). See my comment in Pricenode Maintainer (#5) for more details on that.
In any case, I'm servicing between 25 and 40 clients with this pricenode at any given time, and it looks like it's going to run me around $7 / month on Heroku to keep it running.
/cc bisq-network/compensation#40
2018.03 report
Alas, I have still not finished the review and merge of bisq-network/pricenode#7, and therefore other pricenode operators have not yet upgraded to it. In the meantime, however, my pricenode instance, which is built from that PR branch, has been up and running without issue for a couple months. So I think we can call it a well-tested change at this point ;)
Note that @sqrrm attempted to start running his own pricenode this month, but ran into issues with his hosting provider. This instance was being built from the PR branch above as well, and that all seemed to work out fine for him. Good luck, @sqrrm, on getting your pricenode up and running elsewhere soon.
/cc bisq-network/compensation#57
2018.04 report
Running 2 instances. Still running the old version of the price node. No issues occurred that month.
2018.04 report
My instance ran without any issues on Heroku this month at a cost of $7.00. I'm running v0.7.1-SNAPSHOT from commit bisq-network/bisq-pricenode@545887c.
/cc bisq-network/compensation#68
@Emzy and @mrosseel, could you please report here on this issue about the pricenode instances you're operating in the same way that @ManfredKarrer and I have done above? Thanks.
2018.04 report
Running one instance. Still running the old version of the price node. No issues occurred that month.
2018.05 report
No change from last month's report, but I'll format it a little more rigorously, that others might do the same:
Hosting: Heroku Cost: $7.00 Version: v0.7.1-SNAPSHOT (from commit bisq-network/bisq-pricenode@545887c) Notes: none
/cc bisq-network/compensation#74
2018.05 report
Running 2 instances. Still running the old version of the price node. No issues occurred that month. PS: I know I should update to the new version. Will put it on my TODO list...
2018.05 report
Running 1 instance. No issues occurred that month.
bisq-network/compensation#76
May 2018 report
Paying for a bitcoinaverage sub used by manfred.
Compensation request at https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/77
2018.05 report
- 1 bitcoinaverage subscription
- 1 pricenode running
No issues occurred this month
TODO: upgrade to new version of pricenode, since I run on docker this probably implies updating the docker file.
bisq-network/compensation#80
Are the price-nodes on the clearnet or on the onion side ? (Btw, I have a VPS munin master node installed and running, I will give details on https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq-monitor nextly).
They are running as hidden service but some are accessible clearnet as well.
2018.06 report
- 1 bitcoinaverage subscription
- 1 pricenode running
Upgraded to new version 0.7.1-SNAPSHOT
bisq-network/compensation#83
2018.06 report
- 1 bitcoinaverage subscription
- 1 pricenode running
Upgraded to new version 0.7.1-SNAPSHOT
bisq-network/compensation#88
2018.06 report
- 1 bitcoinaverage subscription (Business plan, USD 35/month)
- 2 pricenodes running
Upgraded to new version 0.7.1-SNAPSHOT
bisq-network/compensation#92
2018.06 report
No incidents this month, everything running smoothly.
Hosting: Heroku Cost: $7.00 Version: v0.7.1-SNAPSHOT (from commit bisq-network/bisq-pricenode@545887c)
/cc bisq-network/compensation#89
2018.07 report
Nothing to report.
Hosting: Heroku Cost: $7.00 Version: v0.7.1-SNAPSHOT (from commit bisq-network/bisq-pricenode@545887c)
BSQ requested: 7+25 = 32
/cc bisq-network/compensation#101
2018.07 report
- 1 bitcoinaverage subscription
- 1 pricenode running
nothing to report
bisq-network/compensation#105
2018.08 report
Nothing to report.
Hosting: Heroku Cost: $7.00 Version: v0.7.1-SNAPSHOT (from commit bisq-network/bisq-pricenode@545887c)
BSQ requested: 7+25 = 32
/cc bisq-network/compensation#114
2018.08 report
- 1 bitcoinaverage subscription
- 1 pricenode running
nothing to report
bisq-network/compensation#116