jpmag

Thanks for the detailed bug report, and kudos for the playground link! Yes, that is definitely a bug. Apparently ryml has a problem when the indentless seq in `foo` is...

Wow, this one reveals something that was overlooked. Thanks for reporting. There is an implicit assumption throughout the code that a YAML line is smallish. Because of subtle token-scanning intrincacies...

Thanks for the detailed write-up. Indeed the amalgamation tool is removing repeated includes to keep compilation times reduced. And indeed the tool is dumb and cannot detect `#ifdef` context around...

@danngreen The fixes were merged to master. I will keep this issue open (and biojppm/c4core#63 as well) until there is a QEMU in the CI in either repo proving that...

@rysavyjan sorry for the late reply, somehow I missed your post. You are correct; at the moment ryml does not implement this. This issue is meant to track progress in...

Sorry, I'm having trouble understanding what you want to achieve. It does not help that the proposed name seems to be clashing with what it is actually doing: `is_subset_strview` suggests...

So in other words, you want to verify that a given node has child keys only from within a certain set, and/or that any child key must be in that...

EDITED: I think there's some confusion here. `.has_all()` vs `.is_subset()` is a question of structure, ie what members are present at a particular node as compared to a node from...

To clarify, I am stating that: 1. `has_all_children()` and `.has_same_children()` are the functions we're looking for (but I'm open to different/better names) 2. Those functions use the existing string-compare, and...

Anchors are meta-structure, so: > Should `tree_a->has_all( 0, tree_b, 0)` return true ? Assuming that `docval` in `tree_a` is meant to be `&docval`, ie an anchor, then --- yes, `tree_a`...