Allow implicit options to be passed into product.sku

[VDuda]

What?

Essentially we'd like to completely utilize the functionality already available to us when we call product.skus() - the underlying all() function allows us to pass product options, but we're limited within the product.skus() function to simply pass an id object. By allowing kwargs into product.skus() we can take advantage of the additional optionality within the all function.

We could then do something neat like this. Implicitly specifying which pages to query. And I suspect we could also utilize the filter options as well - but I need to look into that.

    stop = False
    skuopts = {"limit": 250, "page": 1}
    while not stop:
       for sku in product.skus(**skuopts):
             print sku
       stop = True

Tickets / Documentation

• Issue 18

[VDuda]

Not sure if this project is being actively maintained anymore? I also just added a quick and easy approach to adding v3 support (lacking some structured testing)

[VDuda]

Example call with v3

apiv3 = bigcommerce.api.BigcommerceApi(
    client_id=client_id,
    store_hash=store_hash,
    access_token=access_token,
    api_path='/stores/{}/v3/{}'
    )
apiv3.Variants.all()

[fthobe]

@karen-white Seems to work, any chance for implementation? We would also like to add two other key value pairs on the order, but you don't seem to accept merge requests. @catokx

[fthobe]

@bookernath

[bookernath]

This looks good, but I'd like to draw a firmer line between V2 and V3 APIs within the library as those APIs have pretty different schemas and behaviors.

[Bobspadger]

@bookernath any idea when this may get merged in? it looks like a great way to get cracking with some of the v3 functionality.

I'm starting to hit issues needing some of the newer v3 stuff.

I don't really want to make an API client from scratch when you have this great library :)

[bookernath]

@Bobspadger I hear you - I'd love to unblock V3 usage via this library as well. I just want to make sure we're set up for success adding additional V3-specific APIs and behavior in the future, hence my above comments. Happy to work with @VDuda to see this over the line.

[Bobspadger]

@bookernath cool. If it helps, I've merged @VDuda work into my own copy of this repo, and its so far solved my issues (although given me more as the v3 api gives better responses!)

I'll keep testing it over the following weeks as I build out our store using the api.

[Bobspadger]

@bookernath could you add some more detail about how you would like the namespaces broken up?

As you have to connect to a different endpoint when you create your connection, how would you anticipate the logic of organising this so it is v2 and v3 compatible ?

I'm happy to start working on some of it, but would like a firmer direction before starting :)

[fthobe]

@bookernath It would be really great to get a direction considering @vduda 's enthusiasm for V3 and the fact there hasn't been much movement here in 2018 and 2017.