Sterling Greene
Sterling Greene
@sorin-florea when 8.10 RC1 comes out, could you take a look that this fixes your issue and if you're able to use toolchains in the DV build in more places?
We don't want to add `@Nullable` to all Transformer OUT parameters, but we should verify that all users of Transformer properly annotate Nullable/NonNull their OUT parameters.
This is an interesting idea, but not something we're going to be working on in the short term.
This would be nice to do. The existing SourceSet interfaces are very Java-centric and are difficult to make language-agnostic. We're looking at how we can model this sort of thing...
We're not sure this is something we want to add because of some complications in the API. Would we accept any kind of `Dependency`? Any kind of `Provider` that could...
This is something we'd like to support, but we don't have any plans for adding this or creating a public API for this to be possible.
This needs a deeper investigation, but aggregating seems like the right setting for the auto annotation processor. This isn't something in scope right now, so I'm not sure when we...
We're not sure that providing an escape hatch that would allow complete control over the arguments passed to underlying tools (compiler, javadoc, etc) is a good general solution. Our concern...
This seems like a valid request, but it's not something we're going to work on currently.
@transentia did you see if the amount of memory given to the standalone launcher script vs the test worker were comparable? By default, test workers are limited to max heap...