Ben Sigelman

(apologies for my delay – last week was lost to C19 for me :-/ ) I am supportive of this proposal, at least in broad strokes. The project has grown...

@austinlparker the GC discussed this at our weekly call yesterday. Thanks a lot for getting this going, and we are broadly/conceptually supportive. We would ask that you flesh out the...

Can we add a link to the mission/vision/values from the community README? I liked how it was previously discoverable in the file tree and would like a link to be...

Hm... I also like the idea of providing more "OTel maintainer enablement", and I also like the specific suggestions (e.g., in @sharrmander's bullets above). That being said, I do not...

@kenfinnigan I like this idea conceptually, but anticipate practical problems where maintainers from SIG A won't have enough context about the day-to-day in SIG B.

Okay, two revisions to the proposal: 1) **Attempt to normalize the health assessments** from the maintainers (without getting into prescriptive and/or elaborate rubrics) Rather than just A/B/C/D, we could include...

IMO this is the single biggest execution gap we have as a project (especially if it's a roadmap we are actually committed to from a resourcing and timeline perspective)... and...

> I'm not sure we can provide such a gantt chart effectively, due (in some part) to the nature of OSS. There is certainly some truth to this, and we've...

For diversity, I would like it if we could capture the following, if possible (while respecting personal privacy / "making it opt-in", and also remaining in compliance with regulations, of...

For anybody watching this issue, per the initial issue description, we are entering the following phase: >From June 18-July 2, we can debate [the ideas proposed above] So, consider this...