Benjamin M. Gyori

I'll close this, @Crispae if you have any further questions, please reach out.

Hi @katewarner, I think this makes sense. Interestingly, two other registries, Fairsharing, and Integbio also have separate entries for GlyGen and GlyToucan. In any case, what we could do is,...

Thanks @matentzn, the PR I opened here https://github.com/biopragmatics/bioregistry/pull/1109 implements what you are suggesting.

Hi @IgorRodchenkov. I think the issue is that for the default resolver for BioCyc IDs (at http://biocyc.org/getid?id=$1 where $1 stands for the ID), one has to specify the database in...

Alternatively, we could include these as predictions with an appropriate method string and curate them using the existing UI.

Given that the Bioregistry primarily aims to curate identifier resources, and from that perspective, GlyGen really is just a provider, I think these changes make sense. The metadata (i.e., publications,...

Hello @jeet-vora, do you have any thoughts on this change?

Just noticed this is still open, @jeet-vora do you have any comments on this?

I think perhaps our use of the word "merging" is a bit misleading. What happens in this PR is that we keep `glytoucan` as the prefix curared in Bioregistry for...

@ArslaanZahid thanks, two notes: - The branch conflicts with the latest main, so please try to rebase and resolve any conflicts in bioregistry.json - let me know if you need...