stayrtr icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
stayrtr copied to clipboard
verified publisher icon bgp

stayrtr and Juniper 19.4

Open sarasalingam opened this issue 2 years ago • 5 comments

Hi team,

We are having issues with stay-rtr and juniper 19.4 router. We are seeing lots of retransmission and VRP are not getting update by juniper routers. We are also seeing on wireshark, "tcp window full" message on the capture. There is no issue with Cisco router running 7.7.x

show validation session     Session                                  State   Flaps     Uptime #IPv4/IPv6 records xx.xx.xx.xx                           Connect     4            23/5 <--- Stay-rtr xx.xx.xx.yy                       Up          0 4d 06:26:23 343532/187642 <--- routinator

regards, Skanda

sarasalingam avatar Apr 04 '23 06:04 sarasalingam

What version of StayRTR are you running?

Are you using rpki-client?

What operating systems are in play?

Are the two RTR servers located in similar places in the network topology (aka are the traceroute the same?)

job avatar Apr 04 '23 06:04 job

What version of Stay-RTR are you running?

[Skanda ]0.4.0

Are you using rpki-client?

[Skanda] What do you mean ?

What operating systems are in play?

[Skanda] RHEL 7.9 and StayRTR is running as docker continer

Are the two RTR servers located in similar places in the network topology (aka are the traceroute the same?)

[Skanda] Yes. Same network.

From: Job Snijders @.> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2023 4:48 PM To: bgp/stayrtr @.> Cc: Skanda Arasalingam @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [bgp/stayrtr] stayrtr and Juniper 19.4 (Issue #97)

[External email] Please be cautious when clicking on any links or attachments.

What version of StayRTR are you running?

Are you using rpki-client?

What operating systems are in play?

Are the two RTR servers located in similar places in the network topology (aka are the traceroute the same?)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/bgp/stayrtr/issues/97#issuecomment-1495436150, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVANCVCKDQMASBUAQCEBXODW7O7YPANCNFSM6AAAAAAWSH26JM. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.@.>>

sarasalingam avatar Apr 04 '23 07:04 sarasalingam

Can you try and upgrade to 0.51, but before you do that, if you could install gdb and run "gcore ", gzip the result and maybe we can figure out a secure way to transmit the coredump for analysis

On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, 08:33 sarasalingam, @.***> wrote:

What version of Stay-RTR are you running?

[Skanda ]0.4.0

Are you using rpki-client?

[Skanda] What do you mean ?

What operating systems are in play?

[Skanda] RHEL 7.9 and StayRTR is running as docker continer

Are the two RTR servers located in similar places in the network topology (aka are the traceroute the same?)

[Skanda] Yes. Same network.

From: Job Snijders @.> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2023 4:48 PM To: bgp/stayrtr @.> Cc: Skanda Arasalingam @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [bgp/stayrtr] stayrtr and Juniper 19.4 (Issue #97)

[External email] Please be cautious when clicking on any links or attachments.

What version of StayRTR are you running?

Are you using rpki-client?

What operating systems are in play?

Are the two RTR servers located in similar places in the network topology (aka are the traceroute the same?)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub< https://github.com/bgp/stayrtr/issues/97#issuecomment-1495436150>, or unsubscribe< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVANCVCKDQMASBUAQCEBXODW7O7YPANCNFSM6AAAAAAWSH26JM>.

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.@.>>

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bgp/stayrtr/issues/97#issuecomment-1495486796, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALPK4VQ2QRCQXYWI2GWUALW7PFD7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAWSH26JM . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

benjojo avatar Apr 04 '23 08:04 benjojo

Ben ,

What is the secure channel to share some snap shots Wireshark captures ? We can catch via team or something to share some screen snap shots.

Regards, Skanda Arasalingam

From: Ben Cox @.> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2023 6:05 PM To: bgp/stayrtr @.> Cc: Skanda Arasalingam @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [bgp/stayrtr] stayrtr and Juniper 19.4 (Issue #97)

[External email] Please be cautious when clicking on any links or attachments.

Can you try and upgrade to 0.51, but before you do that, if you could install gdb and run "gcore ", gzip the result and maybe we can figure out a secure way to transmit the coredump for analysis

On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, 08:33 sarasalingam, @.***mailto:***@***.***> wrote:

What version of Stay-RTR are you running?

[Skanda ]0.4.0

Are you using rpki-client?

[Skanda] What do you mean ?

What operating systems are in play?

[Skanda] RHEL 7.9 and StayRTR is running as docker continer

Are the two RTR servers located in similar places in the network topology (aka are the traceroute the same?)

[Skanda] Yes. Same network.

From: Job Snijders @.mailto:***@***.***> Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2023 4:48 PM To: bgp/stayrtr @.mailto:***@***.***> Cc: Skanda Arasalingam @.mailto:***@***.***>; Author @.mailto:***@***.***> Subject: Re: [bgp/stayrtr] stayrtr and Juniper 19.4 (Issue #97)

[External email] Please be cautious when clicking on any links or attachments.

What version of StayRTR are you running?

Are you using rpki-client?

What operating systems are in play?

Are the two RTR servers located in similar places in the network topology (aka are the traceroute the same?)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub< https://github.com/bgp/stayrtr/issues/97#issuecomment-1495436150>, or unsubscribe< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVANCVCKDQMASBUAQCEBXODW7O7YPANCNFSM6AAAAAAWSH26JM>.

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.@.mailto:***@***.******@***.***>>

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bgp/stayrtr/issues/97#issuecomment-1495486796, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALPK4VQ2QRCQXYWI2GWUALW7PFD7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAWSH26JM . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***mailto:***@***.***>

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/bgp/stayrtr/issues/97#issuecomment-1495526047, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVANCVGTS7NX2I3Z3DEIM7LW7PI2PANCNFSM6AAAAAAWSH26JM. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.@.>>

sarasalingam avatar Apr 04 '23 10:04 sarasalingam

email them to stayrtr (at) benjojo.co.uk , If you want to encrypt them you can use

Age: age1x43ujrr5f6z8wydfa8az6qz6v3dw4usxgfgk599gngkcs5f7n92qrcpa2k GPG: https://keybase.io/benjojo

benjojo avatar Apr 04 '23 10:04 benjojo

is this still an issue?

job avatar Sep 05 '24 23:09 job

Might be related to TCP_NODELAY being set in versions older than 0.6.0. This was fixed here https://github.com/bgp/stayrtr/commit/5bd081b90b0efbc0f2b45f544e41127661d969fe

please try with latest version, if issues still persists please open a new ticket!

job avatar Sep 19 '24 11:09 job