bgoertzel

William, If the orange that Sam steals and the orange that Sam eats are supposed to be the same orange, then the microplanner should get one ConceptNode covering the two...

William -- If you have time, perhaps you could propose a candidate solution for this issue? On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:21 PM, William Ma [email protected] wrote: > Hummm......

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Rodas Solomon [email protected] wrote: > @linas https://github.com/linas > So ,I don't need to check if the question is WH-question or truth query...

> > From what I see what I have to do is > > Step 1: call (nlp-parse “txt”) > > I'm not sure what nlp-parse does.... > > I...

Sure, it would be great if you could update the blending code to use the new APIs .. Amen just hasn't had time... ben On Mon, May 22, 2017 at...

Yes, the same should be applied to other node types... On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:02 PM, William Ma [email protected] wrote: > Ah right. Sorry about the wording. >...

Hmm... I don't think it's ideal to pack complex semantics into names. Better to do something like EvaluationLink [123] "R2L-do-no-include:definite" "John@444" EvaluationLink PredicateNode: "don't include in R2L" [123] perhaps? ben...

Oops, I meant EvaluationLink [123] "definite" "John@444" EvaluationLink PredicateNode: "don't include in R2L" [123] ;-p On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Ben Goertzel [email protected] wrote: > EvaluationLink [123]...

In general, microplanning and surface realization will make use of many different Atoms, not just those produced by R2L... The current, initial versions may use only R2L links as inputs...

Yeah, there should be a state variable in the Atomspace for "I am talking" or "I am not talking" It seems there should be a way for the system to...