Bryan Germann

Closing brackets is optional when it should give a syntax error in ucm

2

The following throws an error (which could probably be improved): ``` I couldn't find any definitions matching the name > inside the namespace .exercism.blah 34 | > [1, 2, 3...

When resaving the code with unique types in a new ucm instance I get an unexpected result when I call `set` on the record type. > Either Account.active.set should behave...

After migrating to M4 I received the error message provided below. It would be helpful to add a tip for how to resolve `base` not being available. Maybe include some...