Brian Flad

If you do the run with `TF_LOG_SDK_PROTO_DATA_DIR` set, you should be able to see the result of the `PlanResourceChange` response plan. This might help troubleshoot what's happening a little easier....

Hi folks 👋 v0.12.0 will take a new approach to the schema-based plan modification process by stepping through existing data and passing updates up through the call stack instead attempting...

Hi @PJB3005 👋 Thank you for raising this feature request. I can certainly see how this might be frustrating in some regards. To provide some initial thoughts and insight into...

I'm 👍 for this type of change -- I personally appreciate the pattern of `{InterfaceTypeName}` and `{Concrete}{InterfaceTypeName}` where possible.

We're discussing a different approach to this problem over in #447, which will introduce its own breaking changes, so I think it is best to track it there. 👍

Hi @abergmeier 👋 Thank you for reporting this and sorry you had a frustrating experience. Indeed, the framework _should_ do a better job providing breadcrumbs for troubleshooting about what it...

Hi again, @abergmeier. Since I didn't hear back from you about anything specific here, I'm going to close this issue for now so we can keep track of actionable work....

Hi @abergmeier 👋 Thank you for raising this. It appears like the goal of this change is to return a "did you mean?" type recommendation from the internal/reflect logic errors....

I believe this also closes: - https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework/issues/158 - https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework/issues/214 - https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework/issues/281

> I think one question I'd have is whether this really needs to be treated in this special way with hidden private data, or whether it would be sufficient to...