betaflight-configurator
betaflight-configurator copied to clipboard
betaflight
Add support for using MSP build options
- Details and depends on: https://github.com/betaflight/betaflight/pull/13333
- Reduces cloud build API requests
- Works for local builds and offline
- Firmware flasher keeps using cloud build API request for easy transition
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
is this to wait for 4.6? or should it be tested/merged prior so that 4.6 will work out of the box?
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Quality Gate passed
The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced.
2 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code
See analysis details on SonarCloud
![sonarqubecloud[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/12526?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Seems to the firmware in #13333 still send API 1.46, when this PR can't work (1.47)
Firmware flasher does not use it right now as I wanted to make transition easy
@blckmn has to decide inclusion in current or next release.
Next release. We have to start focusing on bug fixes only during RC phases.
... and we change https://github.com/betaflight/betaflight/pull/13333 to API 1.47
test result of 180d141b
# version
# Betaflight / STM32F405 (S405) 4.5.0 Apr 18 2024 / 13:15:29 (71776a852) MSP API: 1.46
# config rev: 7556c8e
# board: manufacturer_id: FOXE, board_name: FOXEERF405
2024-04-18 @15:35:22 -- Board: FOXE/FOXEERF405(STM32F405), version: 0
2024-04-18 @15:35:22 -- Build Key: 5c236ba9739999abaf794d4215fda4a5
off subject:
Deploy Preview for origin-betaflight-app ready!
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 44f42c3edf5ec638fee8a789b97ade31539efdc4 |
| Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/origin-betaflight-app/deploys/6621a7dbd71d250008d15dda |
| Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-3780--origin-betaflight-app.netlify.app |
| Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
![netlify[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/13473?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-Windows Betaflight-Configurator-macOS WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-Windows Betaflight-Configurator-macOS WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
Quality Gate passed
Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code
See analysis details on SonarCloud
Do you want to test this code? Here you have an automated build: Betaflight-Configurator-Android Betaflight-Configurator-Linux Betaflight-Configurator-macOS Betaflight-Configurator-Windows WARNING: It may be unstable and result in corrupted configurations or data loss. Use only for testing!
44f42c3e -- retested with local build, no key:
make FOXEERF405 EXTRA_FLAGS="-D'RELEASE_NAME=4.5.0-dev' -DCLOUD_BUILD -DUSE_CAMERA_CONTROL -DUSE_DSHOT -DUSE_EMFAT_AUTORUN -DUSE_EMFAT_ICON -DUSE_EMFAT_TOOLS -DUSE_GPS -DUSE_GPS_PLUS_CODES -DUSE_LED_STRIP -DUSE_OSD -DUSE_OSD_SD -DUSE_PINIO -DUSE_SERIALRX -DUSE_SERIALRX_CRSF -DUSE_TELEMETRY -DUSE_TELEMETRY_CRSF -DUSE_VTX"
did not produce auto-detect results i expected (no MSP?):
but did produce this as Discord comments alluded:
Currently MSP build options is supported for 4.6 firmware. See second commit. Firmware part was merged for 4.5. Should we change it to 4.5 here too?