Bernhard E. Reiter
Bernhard E. Reiter
@koplas please also add the details of how we have found out what a value is allowed, including the references here.
IMO it shouldn't be merged until we do a new major version.
What should be the proposed goals and audience of the suggested video tutorial?
https://github.com/Intevation/intelmq-mailgen/issues/12 will start with a "no-mime, system protected privat key"-implementation for sending out emails.
Criteria for selecting a python3 "library" for GnuPG - Should be based on gpgme, as this is the official api and more stable than calling gpg2.exe ourselfs. - How easy...
@sebix thanks for the pointer. I briefly looked at the code and commented there, I'd rather use something based on the official gnupg api. And you only do decryption, verifying...
Ranking our options, regarding the criteria 1. pygpgme as it is already packaged for python3, license compatible, based on gpgme, medium points on fitness because of last release 2012, but...
If 2. would be released, it would be more attractive. I've asked on gnupg-devel about the release schedule. On the other hand it will be comparitively easier to switch to...
I'll go with pygpgme for now and implement a first sending version in Intevation/intelmq-mailgen#12 see progress there
It seems an official gpgme release with a python binding is close (within June) https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2016-May/031157.html Still pygpgme's availability in Debian and Ubuntu now let me continue with it for now...