Bernd Bischl

> Cannot find isNumericNoReq in the ParamHelpers dev version. its still in the PR https://github.com/berndbischl/ParamHelpers/pull/163 > However, why not isNumericNoRequires yup, better name. will post in PR.

the semantics seem unclear to me. a function of "what"? what is n here?

Yes but again: please "document" what would happen. Just saying n lambda values are spawned is not enough. What are they used for?

I think the main question is for what mbo variants would that be good. Parallel lcb obviously. Anything else? And the function is basically an rng for lambda. Instead of...

if that helps to improve the code base, do a PR but lets merge this before #347

close now IMHO. completely agree.

also ok for me. as long as we agree not to do it now i do close some of these thing in mlr and link them in a catch-all thread....

> This is always a bit confusing for people but we have the convention that that i is the model used for predicting the i-th point. > So when you...

@jakob-r why not simply add the note as daniel asked? i mean the optimizer IS configurable? and this is an issue not in our package? but in DK?

i am not 100% sure but i think we need to handle this internally > And another question: just the default mlr options seem to be missing on the slaves....