Adam Bergmark
Adam Bergmark
This seems like something that should be automated, it's not likely that we'll remember to keep this list up to date.
How has the progress been on cabal-refact @phadej?
Thanks for the contribution! And sorry for the delay. I'll try to review this and #652 tonight.
This looks great to me! As for #652 I was surprised that it didn't make compilation speed a lot worse. If someone else could do a review as well, I'd...
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "whenever `gParseJSON` is already defined", Is that something we could do as a part of this PR?
Sorry for the delay. I had a question in my last comment, and i just internalized this PR as "needs more work" but really I think we should merge this....
Hi @alexeyzab, We're always happy to provide help with contributions. I think this would be a good beginner-level task as it shouldn't modify behavior of the library. I think we...
Re. the travis step, is it possible to have it not break the build? I'm not sure if we want to force contributors to install hindent. I could do the...
Alright, thanks for looking into this @lorenzo!
Sorry, no work has been done on this as far as I know. Seems like @Lysxia's suggestion is a promising approach: > genericToJSON/genericParseJSON could also take a list of field...