Bjørn Erik Pedersen
Bjørn Erik Pedersen
>To give this powerful new feature a descriptive name, I suggest "multi-dimensional content model". Let me know if you disagree. Sounds OK ... But how about the slightly more catchy...
OK, we can call it "multi-dimensional ..."
This is a proposal and still in a planning state.
I agree that we should do something about this, but I'm not sure adding more knobs (config options) is the right path. One obvious problem with that approach is that...
This smells like an upstream issue that someone needs to raise at https://github.com/golang/go/issues/ ```bash layouts/shortcodes/foo.md {{ safeHTML "
I have tested the above, and that works fine. I added a PR in https://github.com/gohugoio/hugo/pull/9940 which I need to think a little about whether is a great idea. But in...
This sounds like a temporary GitHub problem. I suggest you try again.
>The function is marked for internal use, and we have not documented it anywhere. I assume a test will fail if it cannot be removed, but I do supsect that...
The two template functions you call is only related in the sense that `openapi3.Unmarshal` can take a resource produced by `resources.GetRemote`. I think your example would be better understood with...
>I'll use the example you provided above, but I don't understand why you would need to add an authorization header once you already have the remote resource. * This upgrade...