Benjamin Gruenbaum
Benjamin Gruenbaum
I'm sorry, I don't understand this at all. I think any solution that would let users use the native language facilities for concurrency (like promises) as part of the platform...
That sounds reasonable to me.
I'd love to help with this but I'm not really sure how to get started.
Awesome, thanks! @domenic @caitp I'll take a look this Friday and I'll ensure I know what I'm doing that I'll let you know if I get stuck.
Ok, I have a few volunteers and we'll meet and discuss this this Friday.
Here's a link to @thefourtheye 's work which we'll build on on Friday (if he won't finish it by then :P) https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-iteration/pull/71
Great, it would be very helpful if you kept a list (like thefourtheye suggested) of tests you've already written and tests you'd like help with - I have 5 hours...
Going to start working on this now. Separate repo and trello board sound good.
WIP - doing (updating as I go): - %AsyncGeneratorPrototype%.next() throws a TypeError when receiver is not an AsyncGenerator instance. - Added tests for Symbol.asyncIterator - Added tests under built-ins
@domenic ptal at https://github.com/caitp/test262/pull/2/files and let me know if what we're doing makes sense.