Jörg Behrmann

Agreed for the cache and builddir, but on the output directory it is userfacing. I mean, it's not like this will confuse users, but it is something they'll see.

For opening our 1000th issue you receive a free complimentary answer. ;) We use dracut by default ans so far don't have any hooks to change that on the fly,...

Can you provide the mkosi files you use (maybe whittled down a bit from your specific case)?

Not necessarily. I'm quite sure the line > Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.130ubuntu3.13) ... is from the dpkg trigger running update-initramfs on install of `initramfs-tools`, as you can see from...

> I wonder if we should provide support in systemd for signing as well although that seems like something that belongs more in the dracut domain. It generates the entire...

That's just just a label for sorting issues, but just start a PR and then we'll see what comes out. It's always easier to talk about concrete stuff. :) To...

> > > > Now that systemd-boot has built-in support for enrolling secure boot keys, wouldn't it make sense to support more of the user facing parts of secure boot...

Like the idea, but I guess an additional step in `build_image`, maybe just after `run_finalize_script`: ```diff run_finalize_script +if args.reproducible: + make_reproducible(args, root, do_run_build_script, for_cache) ``` for some implementation of `make_reproducible`...

I think serialising the config would be a good approach, although I'm a bit apprehensive to just dump it to json, because `MkosiArgs` will most certainly still change down the...

I'd be in favour of that.