Add artist, album to item entry template in the web plugin

[matlads]

Description

Add the artist and album information to the item template in the web plugin.

When searching for an item, Instead of

Doo Woop (That Thing)

the interface now shows

Lauryn Hill - The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill - Doo Wop (That Thing)

which is arguably clearer, and matches the default output of beet ls in the cli.

To Do

• [x] Documentation.
• [x] Changelog.
• [x] Tests.

[matlads]

before:

after:

[snejus]

@matlads Would you mind moving your changelog note to the Unreleased section?

[matlads]

@matlads Would you mind moving your changelog note to the Unreleased section?

Done.

I have a question about this, though. Why not leave the changelog entry where it was? When beets gets a new release, this section will have to be copied over to the 'New features' or whichever section is relevant. It sort of undoes this last commit.

I may have missed something in some discussion or documentation, so any pointers would be helpful.

Thanks.

[snejus]

@matlads Would you mind moving your changelog note to the Unreleased section?

Done.

I have a question about this, though. Why not leave the changelog entry where it was? When beets gets a new release, this section will have to be copied over to the 'New features' or whichever section is relevant. It sort of undoes this last commit.

I may have missed something in some discussion or documentation, so any pointers would be helpful.

Thanks.

You should indeed place it under the relevant subsection! (New features in this case). When I looked at this yesterday, it seemed like the note was under section 2.3.0 which had already been released?

[matlads]

@matlads Would you mind moving your changelog note to the Unreleased section?

Done. I have a question about this, though. Why not leave the changelog entry where it was? When beets gets a new release, this section will have to be copied over to the 'New features' or whichever section is relevant. It sort of undoes this last commit. I may have missed something in some discussion or documentation, so any pointers would be helpful. Thanks.

You should indeed place it under the relevant subsection! (New features in this case). When I looked at this yesterday, it seemed like the note was under section 2.3.0 which had already been released?

All done. Thanks for the pointer.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 63.72%. Comparing base (619589d) to head (44af7b2). :warning: Report is 16 commits behind head on master.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

• :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.