Matthew R. Becker
Matthew R. Becker
Ah so that statement is about the upstream software, not the feedstock. The use of "package" in that statement is confusing. We should change that. Thank you for reading the...
Exactly @hmaarrfk. This is how we do it right now.
xref https://github.com/conda/conda-build/pull/5379 #5387
cc @kenodegard
This is still an issue.
There is some prior art on this. https://github.com/conda-incubator/conda-press
I'm confused. If we allow folks to use a variants.yaml instead of a conda build config, we're going to break smithy, the bot, and likely other things. Am I missing...
I've mentioned this before but I'll say it more explicitly. IMHO we want a drop-in replacement for conda-build that uses the new recipe format. We don't want to have to...
Idk but right now we use conda build to produce all of the ci support files when rendering with smithy. If we move to variants.yaml, we'll have to retool all...
I believe this is the intended behavior for the linter. If it sees `[ci skip]` it skips ci.