Bruno Mendes
Bruno Mendes
Ideally, as a GH action that we can use (in the case of AppStore, since there is already one for TestFlight).
As a thought experiment, I tried: ```scala extension [T](m: Matcher[T])(using ee: ExecutionEnv) { def awaitMine[U >: T]: Matcher[Future[U]] = m.asInstanceOf[Matcher[U]].await } ``` This works when the lhs matches the rhs...
Yeah, I thought about providing a `Conversion` from `Matcher[T]` to `Matcher[U]` if `U >: T`, but then all strong safety in v5 would be thrown away (would be able to...
This is actually very interesting, we should implement this
Lines and columns seem a bit fragile - perhaps there's a way to relate them to `_1`, `_2`, ... accessors?
Also, kind of an unrelated suggestion, what do you think of allowing to disable such cache via a compiler flag or builder method?
> At best I could fail compilation if that's the case If it is useful, I have managed to introduce a bug in the codebase by having some case class...