Brian Demers

Yeah, I've struggled with this one a bit for that exact reason. I'll have to try this out, but... what about something like this: https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/spring-boot-features.html#boot-features-external-config-files-importing `src/main/resources/application.properties` ```properties spring.config.import=optional:file:./okta-secrets.properties # or...

Doh, that would explain why I hadn't heard of it before... Another option might be to try something [like this](https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/spring-boot-features.html#boot-features-external-config-files) and create a `./config/okta/application.properties` But I might be overthinking it,...

I've been thinking about this on and off for a bit. Client credentials flows should be easy to do like this. Browser-based flows get tricky because existing redirects would be...

Hey @degerlac! There are a couple of _common_ reasons for seeing this. 1.) You are connecting through some sort of proxy / VPN / network scanner 2.) You have your...

Hey @matthewzoks! Thanks for the report. I wasn't able to reproduce this. I double-checked the expected hash: `2d5368a3f17ddd95146a5b691775ad0f233d230dbcfe938fbae5e2a33a3b6b22` I already had that version installed, so I updated/upgraded brew, untapped (and...

Short term fix, you can just download the release: https://github.com/okta/okta-cli/releases Unzip it and stick the binary on your path. I don't want to waste more of your time, but I'd...

Thanks for the follow-up! I'm guessing it's related. It could also be related to the fact that we are currently using a zip format instead of tarball. (Again just a...

Hi @sdelamo! I took a quick glance at the Micronaut PR, I love the idea of making all of the `claims` related classes/packages more generic (and not JWT specific) there...

I get it though, it's hard to know where to put the abstractions if there is only one implementation 😄

Equivalent tests _should_ be running already, but were abstracted from the RFC draft before this test repo existed. That said, I do think it would be an improvement to use...