Bruce D'Arcus
Bruce D'Arcus
I created an issue on the parsebib tracker, and linked it here.
Well, per discussion above, I think part of this would depend on parsebib enhancements, and even then, there are open questions on this end. See, for example: https://github.com/emacs-citar/citar/issues/397#issuecomment-966502500. I don't...
Yes; definitely. Performance would likely also be much better, I'd guess.
Cool! "Kind of works"? How do you find the UX? For reference, here's the reddit post. https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/wqjare/comment/iku77h0/
Sounds like we should do it then :-) If I understand right, [starting here](https://gist.github.com/andras-simonyi/eda0daa0b677838022fd7c438b6eadfa#file-org-bibtex-extras-el-L28) is the only code that's really doing the parsing, and so which might go in parsebib?...
I forgot to cc you on this @mclearc; just FYI, in case you missed it, or were wondering.
Just came across `djot`; cool! @jgm - I just thought I'd remind you about one wrinkle we stumbled on in `org-cite` development, which is the question of whether a local...
@jgm - in that case, I think I misunderstood, and it's a property of the citation as a whole, which is I think right.
One other difference between `org-cite` (and `biblatex`) and `pandoc`: it has two levels of affixes; one for the citation, and another for the citation-references. It's useful when you have a...
Maybe a simple heuristic to flatten them (like merge with the affix of the nearest reference affix?), and later add support to `citeproc` as time and interest allow? You may...