Bruce D'Arcus

> But proceedings use the editors field instead of authors. Wouldn't it look odd if authors were colored but editors in the same column not? Sorry; yes, basically whatever goes...

@mohkale > 2\. Make the default configuration empty, so users have to explicitly state they want colors. Per @tmalsburg, even if a user chooses colors, I would be extremely gentle...

I can probably get help on the face details. I asked on the doom discord.

Here's info on a few transient faces, which inherit from font-lock. ```console Face: transient-heading (sample) (customize this face) Documentation: Face used for headings. Defined in ‘transient.el’. Family: unspecified Foundry: unspecified...


Thank you @minad! > Inheriting from the font-lock is the correct approach imo, since it will yield good results with many themes. Many packages (including my own) use this approach....

Could we have two main faces; maybe: - `bibtex-completion-face` (default) - `bibtex-completion-face-highlight` And then specific field faces could inherit from those? Could allow the sectional formatting, I think, I have...

> Could we have two main faces; maybe: I just tried this on bibtex-actions. Face definitions: ```elisp (defface bibtex-actions '((t :inherit font-lock-doc-face)) "Default Face for `bibtex-actions' candidates." :group 'bibtex-actions) (defface...

I ended up merging a "highlight" face with bold, but no parent map currently, since I couldn't find one I was happy with. Here's that, with a local mod of...

Seems this will be a great test for embark and marginalia! FWIW, my biggest needs are elegant support for citation key insertion in org and markdown for document authoring, and...