Bruce D'Arcus
Bruce D'Arcus
> Second, I'm not personally convinced I like a face for individual fields; at first glance it seems you've gone from no color to too much color ;-) But I...
> At some point bibtex-completion could do that as well (it's not like you can search on an icon anyways) but since affixation is still relatively new I'll leave that...
> Interesting. I knew bibtex-actions had that (but don't know how it's implemented) but not bibtex-completion. In both cases, we just add the strings as hidden text. In `bibtex-actions`, it's...
@mohkale - > Incidentally I've also cleaned up my grouping function to know get the group directly from the bibtex entry, removing the need to have it in the candidate...
Another thought, @mohkale: As Titus has noted on the linked PR, using multiple templates wasn't the only way to achieve the current bibtex-actions UI. It was just what seemed most...
PS - I saw this yesterday: https://github.com/rougier/svg-lib
> > At some point bibtex-completion could do that as well (it's not like you can search on an icon anyways) but since affixation is still relatively new I'll leave...
After thinking about this recently, @tmalsburg, we should probably follow his advice, and: 1. You merge this 2. I remove my formatting functions You could even just tag the faces,...
> 2\. My worry is that colors would make things not more orderly in these configurations but less. I may experiment with this a bit with my package.
Actually, I'm thinking the obvious low-hanging fruit is author, title, date. With just that, I can reproduce, and improve, my UI.