Bruce D'Arcus
Bruce D'Arcus
Does that mean one can use an object for the `format` property?
Could you include a possible before/after example in the post, just so people are clear? Also, does this ... > ... rather than making many new unique variables. ... mean...
We should implement this; just a question of how. Right now, we have a distinction, in the data, between "dropping" and "non-dropping" particles. https://docs.citationstyles.org/en/stable/specification.html#name-particles In this, I guess, rather than...
You're correct. As for appetite, my own worry is that could be awfully complicated feature to implement.
Do you have some idea of how it would work in terms of the CSL syntax, etc.?
I will add that part of the impetus for this request is to reduce labor for a style author or editor (something I fully support), at the expense of styles...
Apologies for only now replying to this! > ... then this child style would inherent macro's and the bibliography from its parent (chicago-author-date.csl) but redefine the citation. That is, whatever...
It's just based on the observation that, with most of the canonical styles, like maybe 70-80% of the code is macros. I could be wrong though in terms of how...
I understand. But that seems a _much_ bigger task than what I floated above, and would be dependent on it anyway. I agree with your labeling it for a future...
Just to update on this, we tagged this "deferred," which I think in the end means we would only implement this if some large project (say `citeproc-js` or `citeproc-rs`) were...