Brian Chavez

Thanks Oliver. I appreciate your perspective. Let me know if you get an implementation using `.RunUnsafeAsync()` working. Perhaps we can look at adding a new run helper like `.RunEnumerableAsync()`, or...

Hey Will, Thank you for the suggestion. It is most definitely worth considering `Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions` if/when we make the move to `4.6.1`. :+1: Whichever way we ultimately go, I'd like to...

Hi Will, Thanks very much for the update. Oh dang, that's unfortunate. I'm not sure I would be happy totally going with `Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions`. Do you know the versioning story behind...

Thanks @cecilphillip ! The package link is really helpful. I didn't realize the package was on NuGet already. After checking the **Dependencies** section on the NuGet page, I found it...

Thanks @cecilphillip . Also, found some additional info: http://adamsitnik.com/Span/#how-does-it-work > How does it work? There are two versions of Span: > * For the runtimes existing prior to Span. >...

Hi Minu, My current understanding is that `System.IO.Pipelines` should work in both **.NET Core** and **Full Framework (4.6.1)**. I have not personally tried `System.IO.Pipelines` in either runtime yet. The only...

Hi @ShalokShalom , Thank you for the compliments. It really makes me really happy to see developers using the software we've built together. I don't want to take all the...

Hi @epsitec , I think your suggestion makes sense. However, I think breaking the driver into too many pieces can make things initially harder to discover and use for developers....

Hey @danielmewes thanks very much for your guidance. This is starting to look like a very cool protocol optimization for the C# driver. :+1: :sunny: :crescent_moon: [**_"I've been counting down...

Hi @oliverjanik , Thanks very much for your suggestion. I think you have a good idea. It would be a good thing to allow support for alternative JSON implementations. Currently,...